The attached clip below with Bret Swanson, microbiologist Joomi Kim and Bret Weinstein demonstrates why the so-called “pandemic of the unvaccinated” was actually a “pandemic of data manipulation”.

When you read the underlying CDC papers and understood how the methods generated all of the manipulated data, what Swanson discussed in this clip wasn’t at all surprising. I wrote about this data manipulation numerous times over the past few years here, here and here.

The specific CDC paper (discussed in the below video to provide the widely referenced OWiD chart to support the mRNA injections as life saving) made two significant errors. First, hospitals not knowing the vaccination status of the people these hospital were treating This was detailed in the McGreevy et al 2023 paper also referred to in this video. As noted in McGreevy et al. study, 44% of patients listed as “vaccinated status unknown” were actually vaccinated.

The second problem was that people weren’t considered vaccinated until 14 days after their second dose. As I previously noted in this blog, Unvaccinated versus vaccinated deaths by the numbers (of doses), using UK data by the dose, most people who died after the viral vector and mRNA injections became available were old people who had received their first dose of these injections.

However, if you listened to or read the corporate news or NPR, like too many people still do, you were more likely gaslit and never realized how contrived the CDC study and OWiD’s graph were and still are. Many still don’t realize it because there are still plenty of so-called “experts” gaslighting people with this sort of manipulated data.

Whether these “experts” do this purposely or out of ignorance, I do not know. Some of these experts have too many conflicts of interest, while others simply don’t read anything other than the abstracts of papers…that is if they read the underlying papers at all.

#